The International Monetary Fund’s annual review raises relevant observations on monetary policy, competitiveness, public safety, pensions, the financial system, and fiscal sustainability. For tourism, several of these signals deserve immediate attention. Brief Summary The IMF’s 2026 Article IV report on Costa Rica is neither an adjustment program nor a loan, but rather an independent technical assessment of the national economy. While it acknowledges macroeconomic strengths, it also issues important warnings, particularly regarding the Central Bank’s monetary policy, exchange rate appreciation, crime as an economic risk, and the need for reforms to sustain competitiveness. From a tourism perspective, these observations are especially relevant because of their impact on costs, demand, investment, and confidence in the destination. Introduction In 2026, Costa Rica underwent the International Monetary Fund’s Article IV review, a technical exercise that functions as an external diagnostic of the country’s economic performance and its main public policies. The document recognizes important strengths. Among them are solid economic growth, a relatively low current account deficit, and progress in financial supervision. However, the overall tone of the report also sends a clear signal: the IMF sees imbalances and risks that require timely corrections. For the Center for Tourism Studies, this analysis is particularly relevant because several of the issues highlighted by the Fund directly affect tourism activity. The exchange rate, domestic demand, public safety, infrastructure, competitiveness, and investor confidence are not isolated matters. They are factors that concretely shape the environment in which tourism businesses operate and the country’s positioning as a destination. What is the IMF’s Article IV Consultation? The Article IV Consultation is the periodic review that the International Monetary Fund conducts for each member country. It is not an adjustment program, nor financing, nor an automatic imposition of measures. Rather, it is an independent technical assessment of the state of the economy and the quality of public policies. In Costa Rica’s case, the 2026 report contains 34 recommendations grouped into seven policy areas. That alone gives an idea of its weight. Even more so when, just a few months ago, the country itself was being presented as a relatively successful case on the macroeconomic front. A positive macroeconomic outlook, but with warnings The report begins from an ambivalent reality. On the one hand, Costa Rica maintained real growth of 4.6% in 2025, driven mainly by free trade zone exports, and growth of 3.8% is still projected for 2026. In addition, the current account deficit remains low. But beneath that picture lie important tensions. The IMF warns that Costa Rica, due to its high degree of international integration, is also vulnerable to external shocks: trade tensions, geopolitical conflicts, commodity price volatility, and higher financing costs. Added to these are domestic risks, including one the report underscores clearly: rising crime. The main warning sign: the Central Bank One of the report’s strongest messages is directed at the Central Bank of Costa Rica. The IMF notes that the country has accumulated 34 consecutive months of inflation below the target range, and that by February 2026 inflation had entered negative territory. Added to this are extremely low core inflation and depressed inflation expectations. The diagnosis is delicate: the real monetary policy rate appears to be above its neutral level, which means that monetary policy remains too restrictive for current conditions. In other words, the Fund suggests that Costa Rica needs a reduction in the monetary policy rate in order to better reactivate domestic demand and avoid deflationary dynamics. In addition, it recommends improving the quality of the inflation-targeting framework, as well as strengthening the Central Bank’s governance, transparency, communication, and institutional autonomy. The exchange rate dimension and its importance for tourism Although the report is not limited to the exchange rate issue, several of its observations have a direct reading on this point. The first is clear: a reduction in the monetary policy rate can alter financial incentives and contribute to a more balanced correction in the foreign exchange market. The second relates to improvements in the inflation-targeting framework, whose credibility and design also influence expectations and market signals. The third appears in the pensions chapter: allowing greater foreign investment by pension funds generates structural demand for foreign currency and can help deepen the foreign exchange market. Taken together, these recommendations point toward an orderly correction of distortions that have weighed on the country’s competitiveness. For tourism activity, this is no minor technical detail. A persistently unfavorable exchange rate reduces margins, pressures costs, makes the destination more expensive relative to regional competitors, and particularly affects companies whose revenues are tied to international visitors. Public safety: no longer only a social issue One of the report’s most important aspects, and probably one of the closest to tourism’s everyday reality, is that the IMF classifies crime as an economic risk. This changes the tone of the debate. Security is no longer seen only as a police or social matter; it also becomes a variable of competitiveness, investment, and confidence. The report warns that rising homicides and other associated phenomena may directly affect tourism, foreign direct investment, and private consumption. The implication is clear: reducing violence is not only an institutional or community aspiration; it is an economic objective that conditions the country’s performance. For a tourism destination, the perception of safety is an essential part of its value. Once it erodes, the damage may be silent at first, but very costly later. Financial system, pensions, and stability The report considers systemic risks in the financial system to be contained and acknowledges progress in risk-based supervision. Nevertheless, it points to urgent tasks: approving a bank resolution framework, advancing deposit insurance, strengthening macroprudential tools, and establishing clear rules for fintech and digital assets. In pension matters, the signal is twofold. On the one hand, the IMF proposes greater flexibility for pension fund investment abroad, which also connects to the exchange rate issue. On the other hand, it warns about the risks of possible early withdrawals because of their adverse effects on the economy. These may seem like issues far removed from the daily reality of tourism, but they are not. Financial stability, market depth, and regulatory certainty are part of the overall environment in which investment and growth decisions are made. Fiscal policy, CCSS, and institutional sustainability The Fund also warns that central government debt exceeded 60% of GDP in 2025 and that fiscal space will be constrained by 2027. It therefore proposes a tax reform and expenditure-reordering agenda, along with the possibility of facilitating external debt issuance within authorized limits. At the same time, it underscores the need to address the structural situation of the CCSS, both in the Old Age, Disability, and Death regime and in the Health and Maternity Insurance system. The recommendations point to parametric reforms, stronger primary care, prevention, lower operating costs, settlement of the State’s debt to the institution, and the application of international public sector accounting standards. This matters because Costa Rica’s institutional strength remains one of its most valuable assets. When that foundation weakens, competitiveness also suffers. Competitiveness: the pending agenda The report also insists on a competitiveness agenda that touches on structural matters: greater female labor force participation, reduced caregiving burdens, stronger dual technical education, closing infrastructure gaps through public-private partnerships, better linkages between domestic and multinational firms, and the use of artificial intelligence in both the public and private sectors. Here there is an important convergence with many of the discussions tourism has been raising for some time. Competitiveness does not depend on a single ministry or a single policy. It requires coordination, investment, human talent, infrastructure, security, and strategic vision. Conclusion The IMF’s 2026 Article IV report leaves a clear impression: Costa Rica retains important strengths, but it cannot afford to interpret that stability as a guarantee of the future. The report warns of excessively restrictive monetary policy, of the need to correct distortions affecting competitiveness, of the economic risks associated with crime, and of pending reforms in areas that are sensitive for institutional sustainability. For tourism, the message deserves special attention. The performance of this activity does not depend only on promotion or entrepreneurial dynamism. It also depends on the macroeconomic environment, exchange rate signals, public safety, infrastructure, institutional quality, and the country’s ability to sustain competitive conditions. Read from that perspective, this report is not only an economic document. It is also a strategic warning. CET At the Center for Tourism Studies, we believe that this type of assessment must be analyzed with seriousness, rigor, and strategic perspective, especially when its findings connect so directly with the country’s competitiveness and with the performance of tourism activity.

Bill No.: 22.981 · Status: Called during the extraordinary session period. In plenary, second debate (consideration of motions under Article 137 of the Rules of Order) · Sponsor: Executive Branch · Committee: Standing Special Committee on Tourism (CPETUR) · Submitted: March 29, 2022 · Last CET update: 01/22/2026 Summary Bill 22.981 creates the Protected Wild Area “National Landscape Arenal Reservoir Water Mirror” over the water surface of the reservoir up to elevation 548.58 m a.s.l., including its islands, and declares the Environmental and Social Development Plan (PDAS, for its acronym in Spanish) for the management of its buffer zone to be of public interest. The objective is to regulate the use of the lake under the management category “National Landscape”, making the reservoir’s energy function compatible with productive and sustainable tourism activities in neighboring communities. Scope The initiative establishes a new protection category for the water surface (National Landscape), defines a buffer zone with use restrictions, enables the preparation of a General Management Plan, a Public Use Regulation and the PDAS, and structures the role of ICE, MINAE, IGN and other institutions regarding the use of the reservoir and its shoreline. It does not modify the status of the reservoir as an energy reserve nor its international Ramsar designation; rather, it introduces an internal classification that does not currently exist, which is necessary in order to have formal management plans. Related subject areas: Conservation of biodiversity and protected wild areas; water resources and hydroelectric power; land-use planning; tourism and aquatic recreation; marinas and docks; regional and local development; legal certainty for investments; fulfillment of international commitments (Ramsar). Tourism segments affected: Nature and landscape tourism; lake and recreational boating tourism; recreational fishing where allowed; wellness tourism linked to the lake; lodging and tour offerings in lakeside communities (Northern Zone and part of Guanacaste); linkages with transportation, gastronomy and services. Impact analysis (CET) Regulatory: The bill fills a regulatory gap by granting the water surface a protected wild area category, a status it does not currently have, and by mandating the creation of planning instruments (Management Plan, PDAS, regulations). This can improve coherence between the Ramsar designation and the domestic legal framework. At the same time, it introduces an additional regulatory layer that must be carefully harmonized with the mandates of SINAC, ICE, ICT and CIMAT in order to avoid overlaps or gaps. Economic: Regulating the tourism use of the reservoir could provide legal certainty to existing activities and encourage investment in boating and recreational products with higher added value for communities. In the short term, it may entail adaptation costs for informal operators that have to adjust to new rules, but in the medium term it may stabilize revenues and reduce the risk of closures or fines for non-compliance. Destination competitiveness: Having clear rules on lake use, carrying capacity and environmental standards can strengthen the region’s reputation as an orderly and safe destination, differentiate its offer from other reservoirs and lakes in the region, and generate a positive narrative as a “model of sustainable use of a Ramsar reservoir.” Competitiveness will depend on the regulations being clear, applicable and accompanied by training and communication processes. Environmental/resources: The National Landscape category and the PDAS can help protect water quality, the biodiversity associated with the Ramsar wetland and the reservoir’s energy function, provided that precise limits are defined for permitted uses, carrying capacity and environmental monitoring. Safety/compliance: The bill tends to improve legal certainty by moving from a situation of high informality in tourism use of the lake to a framework of permits and explicit rules. This implies, however, greater compliance demands on operators and municipalities, as well as the need to strengthen institutional capacity to monitor and enforce the new standards. Employment/human capital: The formalization and diversification of tourism activities on the reservoir can generate additional jobs in guiding, boating operations, maintenance, water safety and related services, with demand for training in environmental regulations, water safety, risk management and visitor services. The impact will depend on the regulatory framework facilitating the participation of local actors and not becoming an excessive barrier to entry. Risks: – Possible tensions between institutions (SINAC, ICE, ICT, municipalities, CIMAT) over mandates and use criteria. – Social perception of “closure” or “privatization” of the lake if public communication is not clear about the objectives and scope. – Delays in approving regulations and management plans that generate prolonged uncertainty. – Overregulation or, on the contrary, insufficient regulation that fails to balance conservation and use. Opportunities: – Turning the Arenal Reservoir into a demonstration case of integrated management of a multi-use Ramsar wetland (energy, tourism, production). – Improving the articulation between conservation, tourism and local development through the PDAS and management instruments. – Aligning tourism investments with sustainability and carrying capacity criteria, reducing future conflicts. – Using the new category to access technical and financial cooperation linked to wetland conservation and sustainable tourism. CET position and recommendations CET position: Under review. On a preliminary basis, CET identifies that the creation of the National Landscape Arenal Reservoir Water Mirror can help close regulatory gaps, strengthen coherence with the Ramsar designation and improve legal certainty for tourism and productive activities, provided that regulations and management plans ensure: effective protection of the wetland’s ecological values, participation of lakeside communities in governance, and clear coordination among the competent institutions. Brief timeline: 03/29/2022: Bill submitted by the Executive Branch to the Legislative Assembly. 04/25/2022: Unanimous favorable report by the Standing Special Committee on Tourism. 2022–2024: Consultation process with municipalities and institutions (CIMAT, municipalities in the area, among others) on the original text and substitute texts. 2025: Presentation of a substitute text in Plenary under Article 137; issuance of technical and legal opinions (for example, by CIMAT and ICT). 2025–2026: Calls and withdrawals during extraordinary sessions through Executive Branch decrees. Next steps: Resolution of substantive motions to the substitute text in Plenary, eventual approval in second debate, possible optional consultations of constitutionality and, finally, the vote in second debate. In parallel, it will be key to follow the discussion on the governance of the proposed area and the content of the future Public Use Regulation and General Management Plan, which will determine in practice the balance between conservation and tourism use of the reservoir. Frequently asked questions from the sector (quick answers, based on the bill text) Does it “take away” resources from the ICT? The bill does not modify ICT’s financing structure or reassign its revenues. The institution participates as a technical actor in the discussion and eventually in implementation, but there are no provisions that redirect budgetary resources from or to ICT. How does it promote regional development? The initiative creates a protection and zoning framework over the lake that makes it possible to define, through management instruments, which productive and tourism activities are compatible with conservation. This can provide legal certainty to existing activities, open space for new boating and nature products with higher added value and strengthen the positioning of the Northern Zone and part of Guanacaste as an orderly and sustainable lake destination, provided that implementation prioritizes local linkages and community participation. Official documents – Original text of Bill 22.981 (Legislative Assembly). – Unanimous favorable report by the Tourism Committee. – Substitute texts and substantive motions under Article 137 in Plenary. – Technical and legal opinions by relevant institutions (for example, CIMAT, ICT). – Ramsar Information Sheet “Cuenca Embalse Arenal” and national documents on wetlands of international importance. Legislative year: 2024–2025 CET lead: TFMG

Estado:  En comisión Proponentes:  (según expediente) · Comisión:  Turismo · Presentado:  23/06/2025 Última actualización CET: 02/11/2025 14:30 Presentación proyecto de Ley 25061 Política Nacional de Turismo, Asamblea Legislativa, setiembre, 2025 Resumen Crea la Política Nacional de Turismo  como instrumento de orientación estratégica, define principios y lineamientos para un desarrollo sostenible, competitivo e innovador , y crea el Consejo Nacional de Gobernanza Turística  como instancia de articulación público-privada. Busca dar continuidad y fuerza legal a la planificación turística, mejorar coordinación interinstitucional y establecer responsabilidades claras para ejecución y seguimiento. Para el sector, aporta previsibilidad, mejores reglas de juego y espacios formales de participación. Alcance Objetivo declarado (texto oficial):  Crear la Política Nacional de Turismo y el Consejo Nacional de Gobernanza Turística. Materias vinculadas:  gobernanza, planificación, competitividad, sostenibilidad, datos/indicadores. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  hotelería, touroperación, bienestar/termalismo, MICE, parques/atracciones, PYMES. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Institucionaliza la política sectorial y su gobernanza; reduce discrecionalidad. Económico:  Mejora clima de inversión al dar certidumbre estratégica; potencial para priorizar incentivos/obras. Competitividad del destino:  Facilita coordinación (promoción, conectividad, seguridad, talento). Ambiental/recursos:  Integra sostenibilidad y gestión basada en evidencia. Seguridad/compliance:  Abre puerta a mesas con Seguridad para acciones territoriales. Empleo/capital humano:  Favorece agendas de formación e idiomas. Riesgos:  Sobrerregulación del órgano de gobernanza; duplicidades si no se definen competencias. Oportunidades:  Ventanilla de coordinación; alineación con Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Turístico; mejor rendición de cuentas. KPIs afectados:  llegadas, ocupación/ADR, gasto, inversión, empleo. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:  Apoyar con mejoras Cambios propuestos (mociones/redacciones): Precisar composición y funciones del Consejo para evitar captura o duplicidad. Incluir obligación legal de actualizar el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Turístico con indicadores y metas. Mapa de actores:  Promotores: sector turístico, cámaras, academia; Aliados: MIDEPLAN/ICT; Críticos: quienes temen nueva burocracia. Comparables internacionales / buenas prácticas:  Modelos de gobernanza de destinos (NZ, PT). Cronología del trámite 23/06/2025 — Presentación del proyecto y envío a comisión de Turismo. 07/08/2025 — El texto fue enviado a consulta institucional y sectorial, con el propósito de recoger observaciones de entidades públicas y organizaciones del sector. Documentos oficiales Expediente 25061 Notas y análisis externos Viernes 31 de octubre 2025 En el marco del seguimiento técnico y legislativo, el CET sostuvo una reunión con la diputada Vanesa Castro , quien ejerce actualmente la presidencia de la Asamblea Legislativa ante la incapacidad temporal del señor Rodrigo Arias. Durante el encuentro se acordó realizar una revisión integral del proyecto  con el propósito de identificar los ajustes necesarios y definir la mejor vía legislativa para su pronta discusión . Dado que el país ha ingresado en el periodo de sesiones extraordinarias, el CET presentará la iniciativa al Poder Ejecutivo  con el fin de explorar acuerdos y mecanismos de cooperación que permitan su inclusión en la agenda de convocatoria . Este paso sería clave para garantizar que la Política Nacional de Turismo avance como una propuesta de Estado , orientada a fortalecer la gobernanza, la coordinación interinstitucional y la competitividad del sector turístico nacional. Etiquetas:  #GobernanzaTurística #PolíticaPública #Competitividad Año legislativo:  2025 Responsable CET: TFMG

Expediente:  24.392 · Estado:  En comisión (Comisión Permanente Especial de Turismo) · Proponente:  Carolina Delgado Ramírez (PLN) Comisión:  Comisión Permanente Especial de Turismo (CPETUR) · Presentado:  junio de 2024 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 Resumen Crea un marco para autorizar y operar aeroparques turísticos  (públicos, privados o mixtos) con servicios como combustible, hangaraje, apoyo a aeronaves y hospitalidad para tripulaciones y pasajeros. La apuesta es reactivar economías locales—sobre todo costeras y fuera de la GAM—  atrayendo turismo de alto gasto y aviación recreativa/ejecutiva, mediante reglas claras, certificaciones aeronáuticas y beneficios bajo la Ley 6990  (incentivos turísticos) administrados por el ICT. También prevé que, si el aeroparque cuenta con servicios migratorios, aduaneros y policiales , pueda manejar operaciones internacionales conforme a la autoridad aeronáutica. Alcance Objetivo declarado (oficial):  Incentivar y regular el establecimiento y operación de aeroparques turísticos como actividad de interés económico y de desarrollo regional. Materias vinculadas:  aviación civil, incentivos turísticos (Ley 6990), municipalidades/ordenamiento, atracción de inversión y empleo. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  lujo/ultralujo, ejecutivos, recreativo-deportivo, MRO ligero y servicios complementarios en destino. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Define aeroparque  y aeroparque turístico , exige permisos municipales, certificación aeronáutica (CETAC/DGAC) y cumplimiento del Manual de Operación  del aeródromo. Reduce la informalidad de servicios en pistas locales. Económico:  Potencial de encadenamientos  (combustibles, mantenimiento ligero, transporte, hospedaje, gastronomía) y de alto gasto por visitante . Incentivos de la Ley 6990 aplican vía contrato turístico ICT ; no “toma” presupuesto del ICT, pero sí otorga exoneraciones  tributarias cuando corresponda. Competitividad del destino:  Mejora conectividad fina hacia polos turísticos y puede descongestionar aeropuertos . Ventaja para zonas costeras y rurales  con baja oferta aérea actual. Incluye plus  temporal de incentivos para proyectos fuera de la GAM . Ambiental/recursos:  Requiere estricta gestión de riesgos (combustibles, ruido, fauna) y coherencia con planes reguladores. Seguridad/compliance:  Las operaciones internacionales  deben realizar migración, aduanas y controles policiales primero en aeropuertos internacionales antes de usar el aeroparque; no “puentea” fronteras. Empleo/capital humano:  Demanda perfiles técnicos (operación de aeródromos, mecánica, handling) y servicios turísticos. Riesgos:  Percepción de privilegios  si los incentivos no se ligan a KPIs regionales; riesgo de captura local  si falta fiscalización; conflictos por uso de suelo. Oportunidades:  Instrumentar proyectos ancla  en regiones costeras; atraer turismo de alto gasto  y promover inversión privada  en infraestructura ligera. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Apoyar con mejoras . Cambios propuestos (mociones/redacciones): Condicionar incentivos  a metas regionales (empleo local, compras a pymes, seguridad operacional, gestión ambiental). Exigir plan de capacidad de carga  y plan de seguridad operacional  alineados con DGAC/ICAO; reportes públicos semestrales. Estandarizar permisos municipales  (checklist técnico) y plazos máximos; interoperar con Catastro/Registro. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 06/2024 — Proyecto ingresa y se incorpora al SIL  (texto oficial). 09–11/2024 — CPETUR  solicita criterios a municipalidades y entes (constan oficios AL-CPETUR). Lo que sigue:  Audiencias técnicas (DGAC, CETAC, ICT, municipalidades, cámaras), eventual dictamen  y envío a Plenario. Preguntas frecuentes del sector (respuesta rápida, según el texto del proyecto) ¿“Quita” recursos al ICT?  No detrae presupuesto; usa el régimen de incentivos de la Ley 6990  (contrato turístico ICT), que puede incluir exoneraciones  y beneficios fiscales definidos por ley. ¿Podrán aterrizar aeronaves internacionales “sin migración”?   No. — no permite que aeronaves internacionales entren al país y aterricen directamente en un aeroparque sin pasar por migración/aduanas en un aeropuerto certificado . El propio texto lo deja claro: las aeronaves extranjeras “no podrán aterrizar directamente en el Aeroparque … debiendo ingresar y salir del país a través de aeropuertos nacionales certificados para que reciban y despachen vuelos internacionales.” ¿Favorece operaciones ilícitas?  El texto subordina  la operación a certificaciones aeronáuticas y controles estatales ; sugerimos añadir auditorías periódicas  y trazabilidad de vuelos para reforzar prevención. ¿Cómo impulsa el desarrollo regional?  Prioriza dinamizar zonas costeras/rurales  y fuera de la GAM , incluso con incentivos temporales diferenciados para proyectos en estas zonas. Documentos oficiales SIL – Texto base (PDF oficial):  Expediente 24.392 “Ley de Aeroparques Turísticos”. https://d1qqtien6gys07.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/24392.pdf Etiquetas:  #Aviación #Conectividad #DesarrolloRegional #Competitividad #IncentivosTurísticos · Año legislativo:  2024–2025 Responsable CET:  TFMG

A continuación reunimos en una sola publicación los 8 proyectos que están en la corriente legislativa que abordan reformas y modificaciones a la Zona Marítimo Terrestre. Ley para el Desarrollo e Impulso de la Zona Marítimo Terrestre Reforma del artículo 23 de la Ley 6043 para garantizar el acceso público a las playas Adición de un párrafo final al artículo 30 de la Ley 6043 (transparencia de concesiones en ZMT) Concesión especial para compradores de buena fe en ZMT (adición a Ley 9242) Ley para otorgar un plazo adicional y prorrogar moratoria en ZMT Seguridad turística en playas: planes de manejo y guardavidas (modifica arts. 19, 34 y 59 de la Ley 6043) Canon y traspasos en el Proyecto Turístico Papagayo (reforma Ley 6758 y remisiones a la 6043) Reforma integral a la Ley 6043, Ley sobre la ZMT (reforma total) Reglamento a la Ley 6043 Ley para el Desarrollo e Impulso de la Zona Marítimo Terrestre Expediente:  23.148 · Estado:  En Plenario (con mociones vía art. 137) · Proponentes:  Varios (liderado por Carlos Felipe García PUSC) Comisión:  Plenario (proviene de comisión) · Presentado:  30/05/2022 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Autoriza a las municipalidades a otorgar permisos en precario  para mobiliario y actividades comerciales en la zona pública (50 m)  de playa. Declara que la franja sigue siendo de dominio público  y que los permisos serían revocables  y sujetos a condiciones ambientales y de ordenamiento. La discusión gira en torno a si esto ordena y dinamiza  servicios de playa o si abre la puerta  a conflictos por acceso y presión sobre ecosistemas costeros. (Ver mociones 137 en Plenario). Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+1 Alcance Objetivo declarado (oficial):  Habilitar un marco para permisos en precario en la zona pública de la ZMT, bajo potestad municipal. Materias vinculadas:  gobernanza local, uso del espacio público, ambiente, turismo. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  servicios de playa, tour-operación costera, comercio complementario. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Crea un canal formal de permisos en franja pública; requiere reglas claras y fiscalización. Económico:  Puede dinamizar micronegocios y empleo local; riesgo de competencia desleal si no hay estándares. Competitividad del destino:  Mejora experiencia si hay capacidad de carga  y limpieza; riesgo reputacional si se percibe “privatización de hecho”. Ambiental/recursos:  Potencial presión sobre ecosistemas; urge límites espaciales/temporales y retiro obligatorio de mobiliario. Seguridad/compliance:  Necesita inspección continua, sanciones y retiro inmediato por incumplimiento. Empleo/capital humano:  Formaliza oferta de servicios de playa. Riesgos:  Judicialización por acceso público; captura regulatoria; impactos ambientales locales. Oportunidades:  Ordenar lo ya existente; consolidar estándares de calidad y sostenibilidad. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Apoyar con mejoras . Cambios propuestos (mociones/redacciones): Plan de capacidad de carga  y zonificación  obligatoria por cantón (criterios técnicos ICT/municipio). Fiscalización  con metas e informes trimestrales; retiro inmediato ante infracciones. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2024 — Presentadas mociones de fondo (art. 137)  en Plenario (1er día). Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica 2024–2025 — Señalado en “Participe y Consulte” como asignado al Plenario ; seguimiento de agenda. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+1 Lo que sigue:  Resolución de mociones 137 y eventual discusión/votación en plenario. Documentos oficiales SIL – Mociones 137 (Plenario):  1er día (PDF). Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica SIL – Otras mociones 137 (compiladas):  (PDFs 137-1-0001/0002/0026/0030). Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+3Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+3Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+3 SIL – Seguimiento (Participe y Consulte):  Estado en Plenario. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+1 Reforma del artículo 23 de la Ley 6043 para garantizar el acceso público a las playas Expediente:  24.413 · } Estado:  Dictaminado (Comisión de Jurídicos) · Proponentes:  Ariel Robles Barrantes y otros Comisión:  Asuntos Jurídicos · Presentado:  20/06/2024 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Establece requisitos mínimos  para garantizar accesos públicos  a la franja de playa (zona pública), con señalización y condiciones definidas por ley. Busca reducir conflictos por accesos bloqueados y mejorar la experiencia de residentes y visitantes. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Asegurar accesos adecuados y suficientes a la zona pública. Materias vinculadas:  dominio público, ordenamiento, turismo, municipalidad. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  calidad de playa, movilidad y señalización para visitantes. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Alinea prácticas con el carácter público de playas; requiere guías técnicas ICT-Municipios. Económico:  Mejora la experiencia y puede elevar el gasto al facilitar acceso ordenado. Competitividad:  Refuerza percepción de acceso libre  y orden. Ambiental/recursos:  Debe coordinarse con gestión de residuos/estacionamiento. Seguridad/compliance:  Reduce conflictos con concesionarios colindantes. Riesgos:  Costos de adecuación para gobiernos locales. Oportunidades:  Señalización estandarizada y datos abiertos de accesos. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   No Apoyar . Cambios propuestos: Manual ICT-Municipalidades  de accesos (señalización, servicios básicos). Inventario nacional  georreferenciado de accesos (plazo y actualización). Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2024–2025 — Dictaminado ; avanza a plenario. ameliarueda.com Lo que sigue:  Inclusión en agenda del Plenario para 1er debate. Documentos oficiales SIL – Texto sustitutivo (PDF):   Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Adición de un párrafo final al artículo 30 de la Ley 6043 (transparencia de concesiones en ZMT) Expediente:  25.030 · Estado:  En comisión (Turismo) · Proponentes:  Ariel Robles Barrantes Comisión:  Turismo · Presentado:  05/06/2025 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Agrega un párrafo final  al artículo 30 de la Ley 6043 para publicar y transparentar  información clave de concesiones  en ZMT (por ejemplo, datos básicos, vigencias y obligaciones), facilitando control ciudadano e inversionistas responsables. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Fortalecer la transparencia  y trazabilidad de concesiones en ZMT. Materias vinculadas:  datos públicos, control, gobernanza turística. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  hotelería y proyectos en régimen de concesión. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Aumenta obligaciones de publicación (preferible datos abiertos ). Económico:  Reduce asimetrías de información y riesgos de inversión. Competitividad:  Mejora clima de negocios responsable. Ambiental/recursos:  Facilita auditoría social sobre cumplimiento. Seguridad/compliance:  Fortalece fiscalización y prevención de corrupción. Riesgos:  Carga administrativa si no se digitaliza. Oportunidades:  Interoperar con Catastro , Registro  y portales municipales. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:  No Apoyar . Cambios propuestos: Publicación en formato abierto  (CSV/JSON) con actualización trimestral . Definir autoridad responsable y sanción  por incumplimiento. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2025 — Ingreso a comisión de Turismo; texto base disponible. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Lo que sigue:  Audiencias técnicas (ICT/municipios), dictamen y envío a plenario. Documentos oficiales SIL – Texto base (DOCX):   Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Concesión especial para compradores de buena fe en ZMT (adición a Ley 9242) Expediente:  25.157 · Estado:  En comisión (Turismo) · Proponentes:  Daniel Gerardo Vargas Quirós Comisión:  Turismo · Presentado:  19/08/2025 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Crea una concesión especial municipal  para personas físicas o jurídicas que adquirieron de buena fe  propiedades luego anuladas  por estar en ZMT (bajo publicidad registral). Busca dar salida ordenada  a inversiones afectadas, sin convalidar ocupaciones de mala fe. Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Resolver casos de buena fe mediante concesión especial, con control ambiental. Materias vinculadas:  seguridad jurídica, ZMT, registro público, ambiente. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  desarrollos costeros con inversiones trabadas. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Crea una vía excepcional y casuística; requiere criterios de buena fe  estrictos. Económico:  Reduce litigiosidad; puede destrabar proyectos. Competitividad:  Brinda certeza si hay filtros y límites claros. Ambiental/recursos:  Debe supeditarse a EIA  y fragilidad ambiental. Seguridad/compliance:  Evitar “efecto llamada” a regularizar mala fe. Riesgos:   Riesgo moral  y percepción de premio a incumplidores. Oportunidades:  Solución justa para afectados con prueba robusta. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Apoyar con mejoras . Cambios propuestos: Estándar probatorio  robusto de buena fe (publicidad registral y debida diligencia). EIA obligatorio  y límites de metraje/uso. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2025 — Presentado e ingresado a comisión. (En espera de publicación de texto en SIL) . Lo que sigue:  Audiencias técnicas y dictamen. Documentos oficiales SIL – Expediente:   (Añadir cuando se publique la ficha/archivo del proyecto en SIL) Referencia de anuncio (no SIL):  reseña de presentación del expediente. delfino.cr Ley para otorgar un plazo adicional y prorrogar moratoria en ZMT (reforma Ley 9242 y 9221) Expediente:  24.937 → Ley N.º 10.735  · Estado:  Publicada en La Gaceta (vigente) · Proponentes:  Carolina Delgado Ramírez (PLN) Comisión:  — · Presentado:  2025 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Amplía por 8 años  los plazos para aprobar Planes Reguladores Costeros  y extiende la moratoria  que evita desalojos/demoliciones mientras se aprueban. Otorga oxígeno  a comunidades y negocios mientras culmina la planificación costera. Facebook Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Extender plazos transitorios y moratoria para concluir PRC. Materias vinculadas:  ordenamiento costero, seguridad jurídica, ZMT. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  emprendimientos y concesionarios en proceso de regularización. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Prolonga régimen transitorio; requiere seguimiento estricto. Económico:  Evita pérdidas por demoliciones; pero alarga la incertidumbre  si no hay cronogramas. Competitividad:  Estabilidad temporal. Ambiental/recursos:  Mantener controles para no aumentar ocupación irregular. Seguridad/compliance:  Debe impedir nuevas ocupaciones  durante moratoria. pgrweb.go.cr Riesgos:  Inercia institucional. Oportunidades:  Ventana para completar PRC con participación local. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Apoyar como transitorio con hitos verificables . Cambios propuestos: Cronogramas semestrales  por municipio con reporte público. Asistencia técnica para culminar PRC. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 16/06/2025 — Aprobada en segundo debate . Facebook 2025 — Publicada  (vigente). pgrweb.go.cr Lo que sigue:  Implementación y reportes de avance. Documentos oficiales SCIJ – Texto de la Ley N.º 10.735 (vigente):   pgrweb.go.cr Seguridad turística en playas: planes de manejo y guardavidas (modifica arts. 19, 34, 59 Ley 6043) Expediente:  24.754 · Estado:  En comisión (Turismo) · Proponentes:  Yonder Salas Durán Comisión:  Turismo · Presentado:  12/12/2024 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Exige planes de manejo turístico  con gestión de riesgo y guardavidas  en zonas de aptitud turística; ajusta la distribución del canon ZMT  para financiar la cobertura. La meta es reducir la siniestralidad  y mejorar la seguridad  percibida en playas. (A la fecha, el texto oficial completo no está publicado en SIL; existen borradores y copias externas.)   delfino.cr +1 Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Incorporar estándares mínimos de seguridad en playas con financiamiento. Materias vinculadas:  gestión de riesgos, turismo, canon ZMT, municipalidades, Cruz Roja. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  destinos de playa con alta visitación. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Introduce obligación de cobertura y protocolos; requiere coordinación. Económico:  Costo recurrente, pero alto retorno reputacional y en vidas salvadas. Competitividad:  Mejora la calidad del destino y reduce riesgos. Ambiental/recursos:  Incide en ordenamiento (señalización/aforos). Seguridad/compliance:  Define estándares y responsabilidades. Riesgos:  Implementación desigual sin financiamiento garantizado. Oportunidades:  Convenios público-privados; priorización por riesgo. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Apoyar . Cambios propuestos: Estándares mínimos  (cobertura, tiempos de respuesta, señalización). Fondo etiquetado  con trazabilidad del canon y reportes trimestrales. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2024–2025 — Puesta a despacho y en estudio de comisión. Lo que sigue:  Audiencias (Cruz Roja/ICT/municipios) y dictamen. Documentos oficiales SIL – (en espera de publicación del texto y dictamen):   (Añadir cuando esté en el repositorio) Canon y traspasos en el Proyecto Turístico Papagayo (reforma Ley 6758 y remisiones a la 6043) Expediente:  24.828 · Estado:  En comisión · Proponentes:  Antonio Ortega Gutiérrez, Luis Fernando Mendoza y otros Comisión:  — (ver asignación en SIL) · http://prueba.asamblea.go.cr/ Presentado:  13/02/2025 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Recalcula el canon  a concesionarios de Papagayo con base en valor de concesión  (avalúo de Tributación) y crea un impuesto del 5%  a traspasos  de concesión/acciones. Busca homogeneidad  con criterios de ZMT y mayor recaudación  municipal. Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Ajustar fórmula del canon e incorporar un tributo a traspasos. Materias vinculadas:  finanzas municipales, concesiones, ZMT. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  grandes desarrollos costeros. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Clarifica base imponible; remisiones a Ley 6043. Económico:  Aumenta recaudación; impacto en flujos de concesionarios. Competitividad:  Reglas más claras; posible alza de costos. Ambiental/recursos:  Indirecto (condicionado a cumplimiento ambiental). Seguridad/compliance:  Más trazabilidad de traspasos. Riesgos:  Judicialización si no hay gradualidad . Oportunidades:  Destinar ingresos a seguridad, limpieza y gestión ambiental  en playas. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Apoyar con mejoras . Cambios propuestos: Faseo  de impactos (gradualidad). Earmarking  parcial para servicios críticos en destinos. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2025 — Ingreso y distribución; texto oficial circulado. Lo que sigue:  Audiencias y dictamen. Documentos oficiales SIL – Texto del proyecto (PDF-Delfino):   https://d1qqtien6gys07.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/24828.pdf Reforma integral a la Ley 6043, Ley sobre la ZMT (reforma total) Expediente:  22.553 · Estado:  En trámite con plazo cuatrienal  renovado · Proponentes:  Pablo Heriberto Abarca (iniciativa original) Comisión:  — (históricamente Gobierno y Administración) · Presentado:  22/06/2021 · Última actualización CET:  29/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Propone una reforma integral  de la Ley 6043 con nuevas definiciones, competencias, procedimientos y armonización normativa. Obtuvo dictamen afirmativo de mayoría  (2022) pero ha requerido ajustes, incluyendo renovación de plazo cuatrienal  para continuar su trámite. Alcance Objetivo declarado:  Modernizar el régimen ZMT de forma integral. Materias vinculadas:  dominio público, concesiones, planificación, turismo. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  todo el ecosistema costero. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Puede ordenar vacíos y contradicciones; exige armonización  con reglamentos (ICT/PGR). Económico:  Mayor seguridad jurídica; transición compleja. Competitividad:  Marco predecible favorece inversión responsable. Ambiental/recursos:  Oportunidad para integrar capacidad de carga  y protección. Seguridad/compliance:  Mejora trazabilidad y control si se incorporan datos abiertos. Riesgos:  Amplitud del cambio; posibles contradicciones internas  (señaladas por PGR). pgrweb.go.cr Oportunidades:  Unificar criterios y digitalizar el régimen de concesiones. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:   Observación activa y participación técnica . Cambios propuestos: Capítulo de datos abiertos  e interoperabilidad. Integración de capacidad de carga  y acceso público como obligaciones. Estado del trámite y próximos pasos Cronología breve: 2022 — Dictamen afirmativo de mayoría 16/06/2025 — Plenario concede nuevo plazo cuatrienal . Lo que sigue:  Eventual texto sustitutivo armonizado y reactivación en agenda. Documentos oficiales SIL – Dictamen afirmativo de mayoría (PDF):   d1qqtien6gys07.cloudfront.net SIL – Moción de plazo cuatrienal (PDF):   Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica (Referencia base legal) Reglamento a la Ley 6043 Norma:  Decreto Ejecutivo 7841-P (Reglamento a la Ley sobre la ZMT) · Estado:  Vigente Enlace oficial:  Texto completo (PDF). Última versión

Estado:  Dictaminado (Comisión de Ambiente) Proponentes:  Oscar Izquierdo(PLN) · Varios Diputados PLN, NR y PUSC Comisión:  Ambiente · Presentado:  19/12/2022 Última actualización CET:  28/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Ley omnibus de aguas  que declara el agua de dominio público  y establece un marco integral de gestión (GIRH): rectoría, áreas de protección, concesiones, cánones y fiscalización. Impacta al turismo  por su relación con aguas termales , captaciones, permisos y usos productivos/ambientales; define reglas para protección de nacientes y uso sostenible que podrían afectar costos, permisos y disponibilidad , pero también brindar seguridad jurídica si se precisan excepciones/definiciones para termalismo. Alcance Objetivo declarado (texto oficial):  Regular y tutelar el uso sostenible del recurso hídrico, con visión integral. Materias vinculadas:  ambiental, agua, energía, salud, ordenamiento territorial, turismo/termalismo. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  termalismo, hotelería con fuentes propias, parques/SPA, desarrollos con captación de agua. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Cambios en rectoría, concesiones y áreas de protección; mayor fiscalización. Económico:  Posibles nuevos costos/cánones  y requisitos; seguridad jurídica si se aclaran derechos adquiridos. Competitividad:  Puede proteger activos únicos (termales) pero generar barreras si se sobrerregula. Ambiental/recursos:  Mejora resguardo de nacientes y acuíferos; prevención de sobreexplotación. Seguridad/compliance:  Endurece controles y sanciones. Empleo/capital humano:  Demanda de perfiles técnicos (hidrología/legal). Riesgos:  Ambigüedad sobre aguas termales  y su tratamiento; impacto en inversiones existentes. Oportunidades:   Exclusión/claridad  para termalismo mediante mociones; monitoreo científico. KPIs afectados:  inversión sector termal, costos operativos, cierres/aperturas de pozos, cumplimiento ambiental. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:  Apoyar con mejoras específicas para manejo de aguas termales Cambios propuestos: Exclusión y definición precisa  de aguas termales  y usos turísticos, con salvaguardas ambientales. Régimen transitorio para derechos existentes y trámites en curso. Mapa de actores:  Promotores: ambiente/recursos hídricos; Aliados: turismo de bienestar si hay claridad; Críticos: sectores productivos con captaciones. Comparables:  Marcos de termalismo (IS, IT) con salvaguardas ambientales. Cronología del trámite 19/12/2022 — Presentación. 16/09/2024 y 17/02/2025 — Mociones vía artículo 137 en Plenario (trámite relevante). Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+1 24/06/2025 — Texto actualizado circulado. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica (Estado consolidado en “Dictaminado” según sumario público). Documentos oficiales Documento técnico (SIL/Asamblea):  Compendio y reseña de expediente 23511. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Mociones de fondo 137 – Primer día (PDF):   Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Mociones de fondo 137 – Segundo día (PDF):   Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica Etiquetas:  #AguasTermales #RecursoHídrico #Ambiental #Competitividad · Año legislativo:  2022 Responsable CET:  TFMG

Estado:  Dictaminado (Comisión de Turismo) va a segundo debate en plenario Proponentes:  Carlos Felipe García (PUSC) · Diego Vargas (Ind.) Comisión:  Turismo · Presentado:  28/11/2023 Última actualización CET:  28/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Busca armonizar obligaciones fiscales y de registro  de anfitriones y plataformas con la normativa vigente (IVA servicios digitales transfronterizos), reducir tramitología  y subsanar vacíos  de la Ley 9742. Enfocado en simplificación , seguridad jurídica  y mejor recaudación  sin frenar la innovación. Alcance Objetivo declarado (texto oficial):  Simplificar cargas de registro/fiscales y cerrar vacíos de la Ley 9742. Materias vinculadas:  fiscalidad, plataformas, turismo/registro, consumo, competencia. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  STR, hotelería, destinos urbanos. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Clarifica roles de plataformas vs. prestatarios; mejora tipificación de incumplimientos. Económico:  Facilita cumplimiento y reduce costos administrativos; mejora captación de IVA/ISR. Competitividad:  Entorno más predecible para inversión y operación híbrida hotel-STR. Ambiental/recursos:  (indirecto) incentiva formalidad y estándares. Seguridad/compliance:  Más trazabilidad de anuncios y pagos. Empleo/capital humano:  Profesionaliza oferta STR. Riesgos:  Si no hay interoperabilidad real de datos, el impacto se diluye. Oportunidades:  Integración con plataformas para verificación automática de registro y recaudo. KPIs afectados:  recaudación, número de unidades registradas, quejas/inspecciones. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:  No Apoyar sin modificaciones Cambios propuestos: Estándar mínimo de intercambio de datos  (API) entre plataformas y autoridades. Kit de cumplimiento  para microanfitriones (guía, checklists, plazos). Nivelación de cargas sociales y obligaciones tributarias con el resto de hospedajes. Mapa de actores:  Promotores: fracciones pro-competitividad; Aliados: hotelería/municipios; Críticos: algunos anfitriones no formalizados. Comparables:  Regl. (UE) 2024/1028 (datos STR). Cronología del trámite 28/11/2023 — Presentación. 19/03/2025 — Comisión de Turismo dictamina afirmativamente  (comunicación institucional). Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+2Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica+2 Documentos oficiales Expediente (resumen) Etiquetas:  #STR #SimplificaciónTrámites #SeguridadJurídica · Año legislativo:  2023 Responsable CET:  TFMG

Estado:  En comisión Proponentes:  Carolina Delgado (PLN) Diego Vargas (Ind.) Comisión:  Turismo · Presentado:  23/05/2023 Última actualización CET:  28/10/2025 21:30 Resumen Propone reforma integral  a la Ley 9742 para mejorar la regulación del hospedaje no tradicional/STR  (Airbnb y similares): fortalece registro ante ICT , clarifica responsabilidades de plataformas y anfitriones , y endurece sanciones  por incumplimiento. Busca nivelar competencia con hotelería formal y mejorar seguridad, calidad y recaudación. Alcance Objetivo declarado (texto oficial):  Coherencia normativa, seguridad jurídica y nuevas sanciones en Ley 9742. Materias vinculadas:  turismo/registro, fiscalidad, consumo, seguridad, plataformas digitales. Ámbitos del turismo afectados:  STR/alojamiento de corta estancia, hotelería, touroperación urbana. Análisis de impacto (CET) Regulatorio:  Clarifica obligaciones (registro, seguros, normas de seguridad). Económico:  Aumenta formalidad y recaudo; posibles costos de cumplimiento para anfitriones. Competitividad del destino:  Mejora estándares y confianza del visitante. Ambiental/recursos:  Potencial gestión de residuos/ruido en zonas residenciales. Seguridad/compliance:  Trazabilidad de anuncios; coordinación con municipios. Empleo/capital humano:  Formalización de servicios auxiliares. Riesgos:  Sobrecarga regulatoria a microanfitriones; aplicación desigual. Oportunidades:  Datos para planificación; acuerdos con plataformas. KPIs afectados:  ocupación/ADR (hoteles y STR), recaudación IVA/ISR, quejas vecinales. Posición y recomendaciones del CET Posición CET:  Apoyar con mejoras Cambios propuestos: Mecanismo ágil de regularización  con plazos y amnistía limitada. Interoperabilidad  ICT–Municipalidades–Hacienda–Plataformas para registro automático de anuncios. Mapa de actores:  Promotores: hotelería organizada; Aliados: municipalidades; Críticos: parte de anfitriones y plataformas si costos suben. Comparables:  Regl. (UE) 2024/1028 sobre datos de alquileres de corta duración (inspiración técnica). Cronología del trámite 23/05/2023 — Presentación; asignado a Comisión de Turismo. Documentos oficiales Expediente (resumen):  Delfino — 23766. Texto base (PDF):  versión pública del proyecto. Notas y análisis externos Síntesis legal del tema (contexto privado). Etiquetas:  #STR #HospedajeNoTradicional #PlataformasDigitales · Año legislativo:  2023 Responsable CET:  TFMG

The Living Experience of La Fortuna de San Carlos  By Tadeo Francisco Morales Gómez President – Arenal Chamber of Tourism and Commerce Researcher – Center for Tourism Studies (CET), Costa Rica Thermal Water as a Regenerative Resource Thermal water is not just a tourist attraction. It is a catalyst for transformation—a geological force charged with minerals, energy, and memory, capable of regenerating people, landscapes, local economies, and human-nature relationships. In Costa Rica, particularly in regions like La Fortuna de San Carlos, its social, ecological, and economic value is becoming more widely understood. Yet we are still in the early stages. Costa Rica's thermalism needs vision, science, and strategy to reach its full potential. Thermal Waters as an Axis of Regenerative Development From Undervalued to Invaluable For much of the 20th century, thermal springs were seen as a nuisance to agriculture and livestock. Landowners who inherited hot springs considered them sterile: "grass doesn’t grow well," "cows don’t drink that water." These lands were seen as useless rather than valuable. Only in recent decades has La Fortuna started to recognize these waters not as obstacles but as strategic assets. What began as recreational thermal pools by local tourism pioneers evolved into a high-end, internationally competitive tourism offering. Today, thermalism is the main economic engine of the region. It generates thousands of direct and indirect jobs, drives hotel, wellness, and gastronomic investments, and anchors other sustainable experiences like hiking, cultural activities, rural tourism, and wellness. Institutional Support and Territorial Cohesion This transformation was not spontaneous. It was made possible through a robust institutional and social fabric, centered on sustainable tourism development and responsible thermal resource management. The initial and sustained leadership of local entrepreneurs in La Fortuna has been vital—visionary, territory-rooted individuals who took risks and bravely invested in a different tourism model: one that respects the environment and is deeply committed to the community. Thanks to their efforts, the first public thermal pools, community alliances, and integrated wellness-nature experiences emerged. These long-term thinkers laid the foundation of the tourism ecosystem that today supports thousands of families and has made La Fortuna one of the most visited destinations in Central America. Key stakeholders that joined along the way include: Costa Rican Tourism Board (ICT):  Leader in promotion and sector training. INA:  High-quality technical training in tourism, gastronomy, customer service, and wellness therapies. San Carlos Municipality:  Leadership in land-use planning, road infrastructure, and tourism entrepreneurship support. Northern Zone Development Agency:  Bridge between private sector, local government, and international cooperation programs. TEC and UCR:  Producers of technical and scientific knowledge on geothermal energy, water management, sustainability, and regenerative development. ADIFORT:  Strategic actor in community development, cultural identity, environmental education, and social cohesion. Arenal Chamber of Tourism and Commerce: Driver of local business coordination and participatory governance. Ministry of Public Education (MEP):  An outstanding example is its priority school in Finca Z-13, where public primary students are taught English as a real tool of inclusion. This last point is essential. Early English education in a community dependent on international tourism acts as a structural vaccine against gentrification. Working-class children gain language skills that allow them to access better jobs, create their own businesses, and actively participate in the local tourism economy. Tourism doesn’t displace them; it empowers them. Thanks to this alliance between local entrepreneurship and committed public institutions, La Fortuna has shifted from an extractive to a regenerative vision, where thermal water is no longer just an attraction but a cornerstone of inclusive and sustainable development. Scientific Evidence of Thermalism's Economic and Social Impact A crucial step in consolidating thermalism as a pillar of sustainability in Costa Rica was the study conducted by the Latin American Center for Competitiveness and Sustainable Development (CLACDS-INCAE), commissioned by the CET. The analysis focused on La Fortuna's thermal waters, evaluating their impact from the three pillars of sustainable development: economic, environmental, and social. The study confirmed that tourism-based thermal water use generates significant benefits that far exceed direct economic income: Economic Dimension Thermalism creates productive linkages across more than ten sectors, including transport, food, local agriculture, art, and culture. Economic spillover is broadly distributed within the community, with a multiplier effect greater than that of more extractive tourism models. It contributes to local employment, especially for women and youth, stabilizing income for many families. Environmental Dimension Most thermal businesses in La Fortuna follow good environmental practices: closed-loop water systems, wastewater treatment, and reforestation programs. There is strong environmental awareness among business owners, who understand the resource's dependency on ecosystem health. Social Dimension Thermal waters enhance local identity and community pride. They are seen not just as tourist attractions but as shared heritage. The local development model includes social and educational investments, such as English instruction in a public priority school—a replicable example for other regions. This study provides scientific validation that thermalism can be a regenerative model with measurable positive impacts on sustainability indicators. It also outlines strategic actions to scale this model in other Costa Rican regions: The need for a national thermalism policy to protect thermal aquifers and promote responsible use. Promotion of public-private partnerships for infrastructure, training, and differentiated tourism products. Creation of observatories or research centers to study thermal waters’ behavior, therapeutic potential, and economic impact. This academic input supports the proposal that Costa Rica can lead globally in sustainable thermal tourism—if institutional support is strengthened and mistakes made in overexploited thermal destinations are avoided. A Powerful Alliance As a certified forest therapy guide, I’ve seen how conscious contact with nature transforms people. What is Forest Therapy? Forest therapy is a guided, science-based practice that invites people to consciously connect with natural ecosystems using mindfulness, breathwork, slow walking, and deep sensory perception. Studies from Japan, Korea, the U.S., and Europe confirm that this practice: Reduces cortisol and chronic stress. Improves blood pressure and heart rate. Boosts the immune system. Supports emotional well-being and mental clarity. Regenerative Synergy Combining forest therapy with thermal immersion enhances the effects. Heat, minerals, and the volcanic-geological setting promote deep rest, detoxification, and nervous system restoration. Authors like Jacques Benveniste and Masaru Emoto have explored water’s capacity to store information, frequency, and vibration. Though from different frameworks (scientific and artistic), both agree water responds to its environment and becomes a vehicle for transformation when used with intention. Thermal waters, formed deep underground, enriched by volcanic activity, and surrounded by rainforest, are true energetic portals. Used with respect, awareness, and therapeutic design, they become medicine for body, mind, and spirit. Case Study: Tabacón Thermal Resort & Spa – Regeneration Through Thermal Luxury At the 2024 Planeta-Personas-Paz (P3) conference, an exemplary case of regenerative sustainability was presented: Tabacón Thermal Resort & Spa, located at the base of Arenal Volcano in La Fortuna. This property has not only pioneered thermal tourism in Costa Rica, but has become an international benchmark for systemic regeneration through wellness tourism. Integrated Management with a Systemic Focus Tabacón has adopted a transversal sustainability vision, structuring its operations around six strategic pillars: Culture Gastronomy Wellness Water Energy Biodiversity This comprehensive approach ensures the hotel not only minimizes negative impacts, but actively restores the environment, strengthens social cohesion, and boosts local economic resilience. Social Impact and Transformative Education A key initiative is its work with 26 public schools in the region, benefiting over 6,000 students through: Donation of desks and school supplies Infrastructure improvements Support for community pedagogical projects This is not charity—it is a deep sustainability strategy. As the company stated, "It’s not enough to say 'pura vida'; we must look at how our children, youth, and collaborators live, and act to improve their quality of life." This is especially relevant in regions vulnerable to tourism-driven gentrification. In La Fortuna, a strong synergy with MEP allows a public priority school to teach English from primary school, preparing local children to participate competitively and with dignity in tourism. This is, plainly said, a vaccine against exclusion. Alliances and Shared Responsibility Tabacón doesn't act alone. Its programs are designed and implemented with support from: Internal collaborators Sustainability-aligned suppliers Conscious clients and guests Allied institutions and social organizations This co-responsibility model breaks the paradigm of compensation/mitigation and promotes a new narrative of transformative private-sector leadership. A Regenerative Vision What’s most remarkable is that Tabacón has moved beyond classic sustainability—focused on minimizing negative impacts—and embraced an active regeneration approach. As said at the conference: "This isn’t marketing, it’s action, it’s vision, it’s real regeneration." Their purpose says it all: "To create and inspire experiences to immerse in life." This living legacy positions Tabacón as a model of how a luxury thermal resort can—and should—be an agent of change for its community, territory, and country. A Call for a National Vision In September 2025, La Fortuna de San Carlos will be part of Costa Rica’s delegation to Termatalia, the world’s leading international fair dedicated to thermalism, wellness, and health tourism. This participation offers a strategic platform to showcase Costa Rica’s regenerative model, share best practices, and connect with stakeholders from over 30 countries. It reaffirms La Fortuna’s commitment to sustainability and its position as a premier thermal destination in Latin America. Costa Rica’s presence at Termatalia 2025 – Paipa, Colombia must be more than a tourism promotion effort. It should serve as a national coordination platform. The time has come to craft a country proposal for regenerative and sustainable thermalism that integrates: Science and regulation Local communities and ancestral wisdom Business innovation and real wellness Technical training and international positioning How do we do it? The recent Planeta-Personas-Paz (P3) Conference left valuable lessons for sustainable thermal experiences: Key Insights Costa Rican tourism model – Hans Fister "Our model distributes wealth: renting cars, hiring transport, dining in local restaurants. That sets us apart from typical sun-and-beach vacations." ➡ Relevant for thermalism: connecting it to guides, transport, and local F&B maximizes social impact. Community tourism – Karen Lewis, Osa Peninsula "The most important step was asking the community what they wanted and building together." ➡ Key for developing thermal projects in rural areas. Responsible mobility – Jacqueline López "Sustainability is also profitable." ➡ Thermal centers must optimize their transport, energy, and water footprints. Destination management – Minister William Rodríguez "Communities must take ownership of their tourism products." ➡ Communities with thermal waters must lead their own development. Environmental regeneration – Costas Verdes "The land just needed a little push, and it did the rest." ➡ Reforesting thermal zones boosts biodiversity and beautifies the experience. Local sourcing – Bandera Azul "Lead by example." ➡ Sustainable local procurement reinforces model coherence. Conclusion: Thermal Water Can Transform a Country Costa Rica has everything needed to lead a new model of regenerative thermal tourism: unique natural resources, committed institutions, organized communities, and a global reputation for sustainability. The challenge now is to move forward with strategic vision, strong alliances, and modern regulatory frameworks so this sector can emerge not just as a tourist attraction, but as a tool for collective well-being, social justice, and territorial conservation. Costa Rica’s participation in Termatalia 2025 is not just an international showcase—it is a call for unity. All stakeholders in Costa Rica’s thermal sector must come together, align, and strengthen their voice. Now more than ever, it is essential to weave a strong, diverse, and committed alliance that proudly and boldly represents our thermal wealth. This is the moment to move from inspiration to action—to take the next step with courage, collective intelligence, and shared purpose. PARADISE HOT SPRINGS, LA FORTUNA, COSTA RICA

The Center for Tourism Studies (CET)  presents the results of the Tourism Prioritization Survey , carried out between July 31 and August 18, 2025, with the participation of 75 tourism businesses and organizations . The study uncovers both consensus and tensions  around Costa Rica’s tourism agenda: Security emerges as the most urgent concern. Infrastructure and economic competitiveness remain under scrutiny. The institutional role of the ICT sparks debate among respondents. These findings reflect the sector’s perceptions — but the full report goes further, with CET’s own analysis and proposals: What is the real path toward stronger tourism governance in Costa Rica? 👉 Read the full report here: PDF – Tourism Prioritization Survey, August 2025 Executive Summary – Tourism Prioritization Survey (CET, August 2025) The Tourism Prioritization Survey , conducted by the CET between July 31 and August 18, 2025, with the participation of 75 tourism businesses and organizations, provides a clear picture of current perceptions regarding Costa Rican tourism. The findings show that security in tourism destinations  is considered the most urgent and cross-cutting concern, followed by the need to modernize infrastructure  and strengthen economic competitiveness . Regarding threats, insecurity, the appreciation of the colón, and deteriorating infrastructure top the list, while informality and weak public–private coordination represent additional structural risks. Other factors identified include the lack of bilingual and skilled talent, high costs affecting price–value competitiveness, unfair competition from informal operators, and carrying capacity challenges in national parks. The role of the ICT (Costa Rican Tourism Institute) is subject to debate: a majority of respondents support transforming it into a Ministry of Tourism, while a minority prefer maintaining its current model. The CET emphasizes that beyond these perceptions, what is truly needed is a National Tourism Policy  that strengthens governance and institutional coordination, reinforcing the ICT in its current role without requiring changes to its legal nature. Looking ahead to the next government, the most urgent actions demanded by the sector include improving security in tourism zones, establishing a monetary and exchange rate policy that safeguards competitiveness, and implementing participatory governance with stronger private-sector involvement. Complementary measures include financing for national parks, increased international promotion, improvements in connectivity, streamlining of procedures, and training programs. Taken together, these findings confirm the urgency of addressing structural factors such as security, infrastructure, and governance, while highlighting the need to move toward a state-level tourism policy  that enables Costa Rica to face current challenges with strategic vision, effective coordination, and accountability.

🔍 This blog is an analysis of the article published by Bary Roberts on June 20, 2025, titled   At the Crossroads of Latin American Tourism , available on LinkedIn. Few voices in Latin America possess the authority, experience, and clarity with which Bary Roberts analyzes the major issues shaping regional tourism. With a career spanning both the public and private sectors—and decades of commitment to sustainability, innovation, and governance—Bary has not only witnessed the transformation of tourism across the continent, he has actively shaped many of those changes. That’s why when he states we are at a historic crossroads, it’s worth paying attention. His latest article, published on June 20 on LinkedIn under the title At the Crossroads of Latin American Tourism, is not merely an opinion piece—it is a well-grounded alert aimed at governments, businesses, and communities alike. In the face of a new global context, Bary calls on us to decide whether we will continue to adapt half-heartedly or take the lead in forging a new era of tourism in the region. Bary was both a witness and a driving force behind the emergence of ecotourism—as both a concept and a practice. During his years training and mentoring the first generations of nature guides in Costa Rica, he helped shape a vision that, at the time, seemed utopian: guiding visitors through nature without destroying it, promoting a respectful relationship between humans and the environment. Decades later, he clearly sees how that once-radical idea has become a global demand. Sustainable tourism is no longer an alternative—it is the minimum expectation for today’s conscious travelers. For Bary, destinations that understand this new reality—and authentically integrate it into their development models—will be the ones to lead the way. Because when nature is respected and protected, it not only preserves ecosystems—it activates, as he says, a true Formula 1 engine of sustainable development, unmatched in performance, power, and future potential. Another structural shift he analyzes with precision is the massive arrival of digital nomads to Latin America. This new kind of traveler doesn’t just visit—they temporarily settle in, work from cafés or rural areas, consume local goods, and build networks. While this trend presents an enormous opportunity to boost regional economies year-round, it also contains a silent risk: that local communities may become marginalized in their own territories. To prevent this, governments and educational institutions must urgently expand access to technical, digital, and professional training in these receiving areas. It’s not just about reliable internet or new coworking spaces—it’s about democratizing knowledge and opportunity so that local talent can benefit from, and not merely observe, the new dynamics this phenomenon brings. Bary closes his article with a direct call to action: we cannot leave the future of Latin American tourism to chance or external forces. What’s needed is strategic planning, shared vision, and political will to align public, private, and community interests. The success of each destination will depend on its ability to move beyond fragmented marketing efforts and toward comprehensive management models that prioritize community well-being and long-term sustainability. This requires investment in infrastructure, clear policies, capacity-building, and genuine coordination between stakeholders. And, above all, it requires leadership. At the Center for Tourism Studies (CET), we fully align with this call. Our daily work moves precisely in this direction: generating reliable data, articulating strategic proposals, supporting public processes, and assisting territories that choose to transform their tourism models with a regenerative vision. 📊 We invite you to explore the CET Dashboard, an open tool for analyzing tourism data that strengthens decision-making and supports many of the reflections we’ve shared here. Because if Latin American tourism is indeed at a crossroads, the time to act is now.

Tourism Fuels Costa Rica's Economy: A $3.2 Million Tourist Surge in 2019 In a recent interview on "Café y Palabras" with Claudio Alpízar, Jaime García, Director of Social Progress at INCAE Business School, shed light on the significant role of tourism in Costa Rica and its potential for future growth. Here’s a detailed summary of the discussion, emphasizing the importance of strategic planning, sustainability, and the socio-economic benefits of tourism, along with insights and analysis from the CET. Tourism: An Economic Powerhouse Jaime García highlighted the substantial contribution of tourism to Costa Rica’s economy, pointing out that it accounts for approximately 6.3% of the national GDP. With 3.2 million tourists recorded in 2019, tourism has proven to be a vital source of revenue and employment. García emphasized that, despite the pandemic's impact, the tourism sector shows strong recovery signs, offering a substantial opportunity for economic expansion. At CET, we recognize the irreplaceable value of tourism in driving economic growth and creating jobs, especially in rural areas. This growth has a ripple effect, enhancing the quality of life for many Costa Ricans. However, it is crucial to balance this growth with sustainable practices to preserve our natural resources and cultural heritage. Strategic Development and Sustainability García stressed the need for strategic planning and sustainability in tourism development. He discussed the importance of understanding the entire tourism value chain, including direct and indirect impacts. According to García, a well-planned strategy focusing on sustainable tourism can help mitigate environmental and social impacts while maximizing economic benefits. CET concurs with this perspective, advocating for comprehensive policies that integrate sustainable tourism practices. By investing in eco-friendly infrastructure and promoting responsible tourism, we can ensure long-term benefits for both the environment and the local communities. Our research underscores the importance of educating tourists and businesses alike on sustainable practices to safeguard Costa Rica's unique biodiversity. Challenges and Opportunities The interview also touched on the challenges faced by the tourism sector, such as currency fluctuations, lack of support for micro and small enterprises, and infrastructural deficiencies. García pointed out that improving road infrastructure and increasing the number of international airports are crucial steps toward enhancing Costa Rica's tourism competitiveness. He also highlighted the importance of addressing security concerns to ensure a safe environment for tourists and locals alike. At CET, we are dedicated to addressing these challenges through our research and advocacy. We emphasize the need for improved infrastructure to facilitate tourist access to remote areas, which can lead to more evenly distributed economic benefits. Additionally, our studies highlight the importance of securing funding and support for small and micro enterprises, which are the backbone of the tourism industry. Learning from Global Best Practices García drew comparisons between Costa Rica and other leading tourism destinations, emphasizing the importance of adopting best practices from successful models worldwide. He noted that countries like Spain, France, and Japan have leveraged their strong infrastructure, cultural attractions, and strategic marketing to boost their tourism sectors. Costa Rica can learn from these examples to enhance its own tourism strategy, focusing on high-value, sustainable tourism offerings. CET believes that benchmarking against global leaders is vital for Costa Rica to remain competitive. By adopting proven strategies and tailoring them to our unique context, we can develop a robust tourism sector that attracts high-value tourists while preserving our natural and cultural assets. Our initiatives aim to gather insights from global best practices and implement them locally to drive sustainable tourism growth. The Role of Public-Private Partnerships One of the key takeaways from the interview was the critical role of public-private partnerships in driving the tourism sector forward. García advocated for a collaborative approach where government policies support and complement private sector initiatives, creating a conducive environment for tourism growth. He underscored the importance of aligning national and local policies to ensure cohesive and effective tourism development. CET strongly supports this collaborative approach. We believe that effective public-private partnerships are essential for overcoming the complex challenges facing the tourism industry. Our work involves facilitating dialogue between stakeholders, advocating for supportive policies, and fostering partnerships that drive innovation and sustainable growth. Conclusion Jaime García's insights during the interview provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state and future potential of Costa Rica's tourism industry. By focusing on strategic planning, sustainability, and collaboration between the public and private sectors, Costa Rica can harness the full potential of tourism as a catalyst for inclusion and prosperity. At CET, we are committed to supporting these efforts through our research, advocacy, and partnerships. By working together, we can ensure that tourism continues to be a driving force for economic and social progress in Costa Rica. For more details on the interview and to stay updated on the latest developments in Costa Rica’s tourism sector, visit the CET website.